This isn’t a confidence-boosting, self-help load of waffle. This is actually about something totally wrong-headed I heard from an acquaintance with, uh, clearly different aspirations to me.
More than a difference of opinion, this is about some seriously harmful and life-limiting stereotypes that are still with us even in the 21st Century. Worryingly, this is just one occasion of many that I’ve heard a variation on this theme, and there seem to be social penalties for those who don’t comply.
So I was on my way to the water cooler, when I happened upon two colleagues discussing marriage (not to each other, but I have no problems with that – more in a future post). These two individuals were a younger woman (late 20s-ish), and an older gentleman, with, ahem, traditional views. The younger woman was engaged, but not looking to get married and have children just yet. You might not agree with that attitude (it doesn’t entirely align with my thoughts), but that’s what she wants, and what she’s getting in her present relationship. Good for her.
And literally everything that was said after this point was a cringe-inducing train wreck of a conversation. So the older chap suggests that:
And then he starts to engage me in the conversation. Now there are some people that I work with that I can be my passionate, political and skeptical self with. This guy is not one of them. But seriously, I’m not going to keep my mouth shut about this.
WEIRD BLOKE: “Don’t you agree, Science Lady, that our sole purpose is to pass on our genetic material?”
SCIENCE LADY: “Um, no, actually. There are plenty of ways to live a meaningful life.”
WEIRD BLOKE: “But you’ve already achieved things with your offspring, haven’t you?”
[here I need to point out that for numerous reasons I do not talk about my children at work. This guy knows it’s something I consider inappropriate, but decorum certainly isn’t his strong suit]
SCIENCE LADY: “It’s complicated. I don’t like to talk about it.”
WEIRD BLOKE: “But you know, you’ve fulfilled your purpose in life.”
SCIENCE LADY: “I have lots of things to live for, and not everyone wants to be a parent. Many people choose not to, or are unable to have kids. And they provide a valuable role as caretakers. If everyone is focused on nurturing children at the expense of everything else, how can we develop as a society?”
[older gentleman looks aghast]
WEIRD BLOKE: “I don’t know what you mean.”
SCIENCE LADY: “We need other people to perform tasks that benefit the community, so that the whole environment provides suitable conditions for children to flourish. And for some people, that’s a role they’re better suited to than parenthood.”
WEIRD BLOKE: “Oh, well I think you’re wrong.”
So that was depressing. It’s amazing what things you learn about the beliefs of others when they let their guard down. Anyway, time for some Grade-A ranting:
- So men are all commitment-phobic? Well, that’s not true, although men may generally have different requirements for wishing to settle down that don’t match those of many women, thereby creating this impression. I also think it’s a lot to do with maturity, and the notion that other things in a man’s life need to be sorted before he allows himself to be vulnerable. And the unrealistic ideals society has about relationships (oooh, another post on this, too!).
- It doesn’t really say good things about him, given that he’s saying how fickle his own gender is. Doesn’t matter if he’s repeating society’s lie, it’s still bullshit.
- This young woman is clearly happy in her relationship choice, and she doesn’t need some weird bloke telling her that she should do it differently.
- If someone is living with a person, and they’re engaged to be married, there is a certain amount of commitment inherent in that situation.
- While I have “passed on my genetic material” (could we make it sound any more clinical?), I have many ambitions, dreams, and goals. I want to be successful, to be remembered as a contributor to society, to enhance the lives of others who aren’t necessarily blood relatives.
- Unfortunately, having children does pose some restrictions on one’s life, especially in a society that still leaves most of the child-rearing burden on one parent. And many people don’t like kids, don’t want the responsibility, and just want something else from life. They don’t need anyone’s approval or opinions on whether their lifestyle is valid.
- Some people are unable to have children, for a huge variety of reasons. Some of them are OK with that; many of them aren’t. Attaching moral value to a distressing situation that cannot be resolved is cruel and simplistic.
- The world has 7 billion inhabitants and rising at the time of writing this. Numerous studies have demonstrated that there are too many of us, consuming resources at too great a pace, for the planet to be able to support us. Of course many people will want to have children of their own, but forcing people down this route is slowly killing us all (have a great day, but don’t forget the ever-looming reminder of your own mortality!).
- This statement shows that this individual views the child-free as less worthy. You may think, “oh, well that’s just one individual’s bigoted opinion”, but there is evidence that those who choose to stay single and/or childless are seen as less mature, stable, and with lower status (Career-wise, not having children penalises men, and having children disadvantages women. Talk about a zero-sum game.).
- Women in particular are the recipients of an inordinate amount of questioning regarding the status of their reproductive organs. Not only is this intrusive and downright inappropriate, the sexist expectation that all women are incubators-in-waiting needs to be sent back to the 1800s.
So that was my Tuesday. Let’s see what pisses me off tomorrow!